🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough setup but includes several key changes:

• Each team has just eight real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players grant full XP, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Only two maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking are disabled.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its name: it offers a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for players seeking alternative methods to have fun with the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Player Reactions: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," reads one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," and another details all the issues they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," says a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are players who actually go outside and don't play this game 24/7. Let them find a middle ground," states another. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," and someone else applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Community Input

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase queue times more extended for other modes because of the sheer number of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face AI-filled matches in the current modes. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to remove XP farming from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the community meeting them in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user describes this mode as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Occur?

If Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and acting on player input. Assignments being too difficult were adjusted very quickly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.