🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.