🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.